Michigan and Florida Primaries: Does it Matter?

Michigan and Florida Primaries: Does it Matter? There is no single best answer to this question, as an answer depends on your democratic candidate of choice. A Clinton supporter definitely wants these votes counted, whereas an Obama supporter does not. Well, let me tell you where I stand.

Before I begin, let me remind you why the DNC is faced with such a dilemma--whether or not to count these votes. Michigan and Florida were punished for having primaries too early, a violation of DNC rules. Out of all the democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton was the only candidate whose name was on that ballot, as the others were advised not to do so. A similar scenario happened in Florida. But the big question that remains is: Should those votes matter?

The United States of America is a country governed by rules. President Bush will be quick to tell you that failure to obey established rules carry some consquences. I would not disagree with the president. By having primaries so early (a violation of DNC rules), these two states wanted to draw a lot of attention (media and public)toward them. Well, guess what? They got the attention in a way they did not hope for! Let me quote a Greek proverb: "Dura lex, sed lex". (literally translated as, "The law is harsh, but it is the law." The law must be followed!

Most of us, especially Clinton supporters, would want a "redone" primary in those two states because they believe they could beat Obama by a landslide (they certainly will and can). The fact of the matter is, you do not condone breakage of the law. Should there be a primary makeover in Michigan and Florida? No! It appears as if those votes are being disenfranchised, and I feel bad for those voters. But the reality of the matter is "Dura lex, sed lex!"